Update the_decline_of_philosophy_and_religion.md

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/content/en/blog/the_decline_of_philosophy_and_religion.md b/content/en/blog/the_decline_of_philosophy_and_religion.md
index b59b7ed..fc0a46b 100644
--- a/content/en/blog/the_decline_of_philosophy_and_religion.md
+++ b/content/en/blog/the_decline_of_philosophy_and_religion.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tags = [
 
 The philosophical crisis has been going on since the beginning of the 20th century. The last century was eventful: wars, socialism, terrible working conditions that people had to endure 12 hours a day and the philosophy of existentialism looking for a way to exist in this terrible world. Subsequently, it took the form of cyberpunk. The dystopias of that time were written under the prism of hard times, Americans saw their future as disappointing, especially against the backdrop of the economic miracle in Japan, hence the geisha on the banner in «Blade Runner» (1982).
 
-Often, the technical illiteracy of humanities scholars, despite their deep knowledge in their field, affects issues related to AI. At the moment, these are complex algorithms using data from almost the entire Internet and taking into account user feedback. Their task is to give a statistically correct answer. No more, no less. Neural networks will never reach the “intelligence”, albeit artificial, that will solve all the problems of humanity. My opinion is based on the thesis that people do not have problems in a global sense. There are only tasks that it must solve and will solve, as it has always been. One form of life replaced another: unicellular, multicellular, vertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and so on up to Homo sapiens, which by the way arose 300000 years ago, and who will come after him? And how long will this last?
+Often, the technical illiteracy of humanities scholars, despite their deep knowledge in their field, affects issues related to AI. At the moment, these are complex algorithms using data from almost the entire Internet and taking into account user feedback. Their task is to give a statistically correct answer. No more, no less. Neural networks will never become the intelligence that will solve all of humanity's problems. My opinion is based on the thesis that people do not have problems in a global sense. There are only tasks that it must solve and will solve, as it has always been. One form of life replaced another: unicellular, multicellular, vertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and so on up to Homo sapiens, which by the way arose 300000 years ago, and who will come after him? And how long will this last?
 
 Sunset implies dawn. Simply put, when work is not going well, you need to take a break and do something else. Humanity has been looking for its ideology for a very long time, in my opinion even longer than necessary, turning a blind eye to specific problems that were right under its nose. And now that culture has exhausted itself, when everything new is a cheap carbon copy in a fashionable wrapper, which with each iteration becomes more and more rotten, I want to ask: Aren't you tired of it? Remember the last time you watched something truly worthwhile, something that turned your understanding of the world inside out, made you experience a storm of emotions, gave your synapses food for thought for the coming years?